Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

Loading...

References

  1. Fred Johansson. Psychometric evaluation and optimization of the self-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.. Journal of affective disorders, 2025
  2. Muhammad Ishrat Husain. Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA network open, 2025
  3. Raymond W Lam. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Update on Clinical Guidelines for Management of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults: Réseau canadien pour les traitements de l'humeur et de l'anxiété (CANMAT) 2023 : Mise à jour des lignes directrices cliniques pour la prise en charge du trouble dépressif majeur chez les adultes.. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2024
  4. Gregory E Simon. Management of Depression in Adults: A Review.. JAMA, 2024
  5. David Byrne. An exploratory graphical analysis of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale pre- and post-treatment using pooled antidepressant trial secondary data.. Journal of affective disorders, 2024
  6. Gerald Gartlehner. Nonpharmacologic and Pharmacologic Treatments of Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for a Clinical Guideline by the American College of Physicians.. Annals of internal medicine, 2023
  7. P. Cuijpers. From treatment resistance to sequential treatments of depression. World Psychiatry, 2023
  8. I. Turkoz. Clinically meaningful changes on depressive symptom measures and patient‐reported outcomes in patients with treatment‐resistant depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2020
  9. M. Hengartner. Efficacy of new-generation antidepressants assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the gold standard clinician rating scale: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. PLoS ONE, 2019
  10. A. Qaseem. Nonpharmacologic Versus Pharmacologic Treatment of Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2016
  11. Daphne Z Kounali. The relative responsiveness of test instruments can be estimated using a meta-analytic approach: an illustration with treatments for depression.. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016
  12. Tong Guo. Measurement-Based Care Versus Standard Care for Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Blind Raters.. The American journal of psychiatry, 2015
  13. Janet B W Williams. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA). British Journal of Psychiatry, 2008
  14. Jonathan R. T. Davidson. The Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1986
  15. Reference - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14050652)
  16. Reference - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29427)
  17. Reference - 10.7326/M15-2570)
  18. Reference - 10.7326/M22-1845)
  19. Reference - 10.1001/jama.2024.5756)